
Originally Posted by
MantellaGuy
That was the individual, Mantella loppei which is on the page I found the other night whilst double checking for you. Looks like I don't need to find it now lol But that, is what you would call a confer specimen, so the individual, if it is indeed the one from the same population would be named Mantella cf madagascarensis.
I wouldn't call it erroneous, there are an incredible amount of scientific papers and research journals that are put forward by people that get rejected on the basis that there isn't enough information or the findings need elaboration (describing a species is incredibly hard and not always accepted). The best example of a paper that needed resubmitting was one by Hou Mian concerning the final identification of Tylototriton yangi or otherwise known as Tylototriton.cf.kweichowensis, for many years!
There are still people that end up sticking with the naming though that don't want to confuse matters, which I would say is less erroneous than keeping what could be potential a completely species, with another species on the basis that it wasn't reclassified... Actually, I would say that was more clever for maintaining the species.
However, without genetic testing though, you can not be certain completely, as you only have one source stating this information. It could be quite possibly Mantella loppei but it could also still be a hybrid...