B.S. (Biology) Arizona State University 2008
PhD (Quantitative biology) University of Texas at Arlington, Attained Candidacy 2010, expected graduation in 2013
Employment: Graduate Teaching Assistant from 2008 to present.
Almost every vertebrate ends up with pinworms. You have pinworms, I have pinworms.. I guarantee that you have transmitted pinworms to your frogs by just picking them up.Nothing is parasite free, whether WC or CB, an "ecologist" should be aware of that. Do you feed crickets? Guess what, they typically carry pinworms. Parasites cannot be eliminated, only managed.
Risk is not a dichotomy. Risk is on a sliding scale. It can be reduced and balanced against benefits, never eliminated. The question here is whether or not feeding wild caught frogs to your pets is worth the benefit. On the other hand, nutritionally superb. On the other hand, there are huge parasite concerns no matter what you do, because wild caught frogs carry many different parasites, from pinworms to cestodes, flukes, trematodes, and nematodes nastier than their pinworm cousins. To say nothing of microparasites like protists. Most of which are specialized in parasitizing frogs, and most of which your captive budgetts/pacmans/african bullfrogs have no evolutionary experience with. And no amount of quarantine can fix this, you have to pump them full of anti-parasitic drugs, and that gets expensive very fast when you consider some of them are controlled substances, and you risk ODing your pets, or inducing drug resistance in the parasites that survive to enter your pet.
Juxtaposed against this tradeoff, we have others. Like using lab bred frogs, large insects (hornworms, cockroaches), supplementing with the occasional frozen/thawed quail dangled from forceps, or small captive fish like guppies for aquatic species. Fewer parasite concerns than frogs, and the nutrition is just as good.
So, which is the better choice, and thus the one we are obligated to take when we have a duty of care to an animal we hold captive? Obviously the second.
Oh, I did study economics to a far lesser extent, obviously more than you did. If you create a market for captive bred frogs through demand, refusing to pay the lower prices for wild caught animals, breeders will get the message, on a small scale at first. Then growing as retailers get the same message, particularly after a nice little PR campaign. There are a great many species that used to simply be imported, which are now captive bred (and not just frogs). They are more expensive now, but the market persists, because most hobbyists, unless they want a very particular species uncommon in the trade, insist on captive bred specimens. There is definitely a place in the market for healthier, human-acclimated frogs, that do not contribute to the decline of wild populations. Captive breeding is viable for the same reason why there is a market for fair trade coffee/sugar, clothes not made in sweatshops using child labor. People look at something other than the price when making economic choices. Quality and ethical priorities are major priorities for people.Lead the charge, let's see how long you can afford to dump money into the pit of breeding $5 frogs. You may or may not be an ecologist, but you sure as hell didn't study economics if you think you can pull that off.
Of course, there are always non-market solutions as well, such as lobbying governments to tighten restrictions on commercial collection of their native wildlife.






Reply With Quote
![United States [United States]](images/flags/United States.gif)
