I have seen many diff. species(pretaining to newts/sals/and darts) being sold at very high costs. This is usually the result of rarity that the cost goes up. I can see both good and bad in this.
The good:
Professionals are most likely to end up with them. This is good, due to proven ability to maintain and breed frogs at a professional level.
The bad:
The price of some of these species is so high that 90% of keepers simply can't even afford to try and populate the hobby with CB examples. I think there are many keepers(particularly those who do not frequent forums) that are more than capable of breeding some of the ridiculously high priced species.
I think that high costs does more to keep a species rare, and does little to actually help CB population densities.
I want to be clear, I understand what a return on investment is, but once you break even, how ahead do you need to get?
If the species is a rarity and you have made your return profit, why not choose to sell them at a reasonable price to people who have demonstrated ability to care for darts on all levels, and not sell them at expos? This would do more for the species well being than farming them at expos to Johnny Knows ****, but has $100's to spend on impulse.
I am not speaking from a position that I think I am capable of taking on these rarities, in fact I am quite new. I do however know many people who do not come to these forums, but are exceptional keepers and have been breeding darts since they were available. A lot of those friends are not rich, and work hard to earn. Should these highly skilled keepers be denied the chance to contribute to a species based on cost and not ability?
I would love to hear any comments, and also, this thread was talking primarily about the pumilio's, and some other high enders...
Thanks!
JBear