They were lumped together under Bufo. Interesting to note that coniferus and the extinct periglenes are also currently found in the genus of Ollotis.
They were lumped together under Bufo. Interesting to note that coniferus and the extinct periglenes are also currently found in the genus of Ollotis.
Founder of Frogforum.net (2008) and Caudata.org (2001)
You can always write a strongly worded letter to Frost or we can go visit him at the AMNH in NYC.
He he...you guys do this allot..dont you. He He, you crack me up![]()
Yes we do. To my eye, Kurt tends to accept anything published in a journal as being gospel. Myself, I am a career research scientist and I know better :P. Especially when many authorities aren't swallowing these proposed name changes - and that's all they are Kurt, proposed - they mean nothing if most zoologists don't accept them and use them.
Addition: Further to my last point, this paper has been out for 3 years now and Amphibiaweb is still towing the old line, as are many others. I think that says something.
Founder of Frogforum.net (2008) and Caudata.org (2001)
I see your point very clearly and I respect it. Do I agree with it? Part of me does, but then part of me doesn't. I am kind of on the fence. To me it makes sense that a genus like Bufo should be broken up to some degree and maybe you can agree with that statement. If I am understanding you, you just disagree with Frost's proposal? Hyla and Dendrobates were also broken up and I support the changes to Hyla even more. With Dendrobates I am on the fence.
Its funny how this all started. Johnny stated he was having a tough time finding info on Bufo nebulifer, so I suggested he try searching using the "new" name Ollotis nebulifer. Never meant to start an argument with John.
I think of it as a constructive debate!
Founder of Frogforum.net (2008) and Caudata.org (2001)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)