Hello there

[aramcheck]

As I like to point out to Kurt, the jury is still out on that Frost paper. When Amphibiaweb starts drinking the coolaid then it's time to make the change.

The veridis/viridis was me not being fully awake at the end of a long day at work, the Bufo/Pseudepidelea was me sitting on the fence and checking what the world is going to do before I commit (same with Mesotriton/Ichtyosaura)

[Kurt]

Ok you quite excused. As you can see not all have accepted the new revisions. So no demerits for you using older genera. Unless you were to call a White's treefrog a Rana caerulea, because that is not a recent revision. I think that name is at least 100 years out of date.

I have heard of Mesotriton, but not Ichtyosaura. Is it new?

[aramcheck]

Ok you quite excused. As you can see not all have accepted the new revisions. So no demerits for you using older genera. Unless you were to call a White's treefrog a Rana caerulea, because that is not a recent revision. I think that name is at least 100 years out of date.

I have heard of Mesotriton, but not Ichtyosaura. Is it new?

Good to know I am escused, i did not want to start with a bad impression. When the Triturus group was split, the Alpine newt was given the Mesotriton genus, at least one author (can't remember who) argued that it should revert to the older Ichtyosaura genus... But so far I have never seen anyone using it.

[Kurt]

Thanks for the info.