Welcome aboard and for what its worth the last one was mispelled, its viridis. Also the genus has changed. Its now Pseudepidalea viridis (Laurenti, 1768) according to Frost. http://research.amnh.org/herpetology...es.php?id=3362
Welcome aboard and for what its worth the last one was mispelled, its viridis. Also the genus has changed. Its now Pseudepidalea viridis (Laurenti, 1768) according to Frost. http://research.amnh.org/herpetology...es.php?id=3362
As I like to point out to Kurt, the jury is still out on that Frost paper. When Amphibiaweb starts drinking the coolaid then it's time to make the change.
Founder of Frogforum.net (2008) and Caudata.org (2001)
Well, I have already drank a lot of cool aid, I especially enjoyed the Anaxyrus and Ollotis flavors. LOL Pseudepidalea, Rhaebo, and Chanus aren't that bad either.
Ok you quite excused. As you can see not all have accepted the new revisions. So no demerits for you using older genera. Unless you were to call a White's treefrog a Rana caerulea, because that is not a recent revision. I think that name is at least 100 years out of date.
I have heard of Mesotriton, but not Ichtyosaura. Is it new?
Good to know I am escused, i did not want to start with a bad impression.When the Triturus group was split, the Alpine newt was given the Mesotriton genus, at least one author (can't remember who) argued that it should revert to the older Ichtyosaura genus... But so far I have never seen anyone using it.
Thanks for the info.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)