
Originally Posted by
JimO
Let me just say a few things. First, I do appreciate having information available related to the many reasons not to crossbreed darts, even different morphs. I would never have known it was a problem years ago when I first became interested in the hobby if the information wasn't out there. As a result of becoming informed, I have not and will never create hybrid frogs and I'm pretty careful to document the origins of my frogs' bloodlines and I try to minimize inbreeding as much as possible.
Having said that, I can also understand the position of people who have gotten into frogs after having kept reptiles and many birds and mammals, especially domesticated species. We have to realize that many people have never been told that creating hybrids is a bad thing.
It's important to educate people, but it is counterproductive to question their ethics in this matter unless there is a documented history of wrecklessness and greed. And, most folks will have a serious problem if they are singled out as unethical. Clearly, it's generally considered ethical to create hybrids of domesticated animals, whether they be dogs, cattle, or chickens. Creating hybrid rodents for feeders that might maximize productivity and nutrition is considered a good thing. Hybridization in the reptile world is widely accepted and even encouraged and most people don't consider it unethical. So, if someone comes into the frog hobby from that type of background, they will likely not understand why anyone would call them unethical for producing a hybrid amphibian. I believe that educating is much more effective that arguing with them over ethics. Telling someone the rational reasons for not creating hybrids will be far better received that simply saying they're an idiot the first time the issue comes up. And since new people enter the hobby every day, the message will have to be patiently repeated over and over and over. It might get frustrating, but that's the best way to convince people.
Ethics and arguments over whether hybridization is good or bad aside, an interesting discussion would be what evidence is there regarding the potential impacts of hybridization on wild populations. Obviously, if a breeding program is intended to create a pool of animals for re-introduction, then extreme care must be taken to preserve the genetic integrity of the captive population. And due to chytrid, there could be an unprecidented need to reintroduce many species of amphibians in the future. But, under normal circumstances, is there any scientific evidence to suggest, for example, whether all the hybridization of red rat snakes (corn snakes) in the pet trade has had or will have a negative impact on the wild populations? I think this might be a worthy discussion that could be conducted without the personal attacks.