Quote Originally Posted by SethD View Post
But the issue is you have no basis for your reasoning at all beyond your personal preference. You said your not talking about possible future reintroductions which leaves them as pets. Saying that in a pet natural is automatically better than unnatural makes about as much sense as saying that people should only keep wolves or other wild canines instead of dogs because wild canines are more natural. If you want a wild type fine, I take no issue with that, I like a lot of wild types myself. However I also don't have a problem with something different and to me it really defies logic as to why someone would object to what type of pet frog someone else had so strongly that they would actively campaign against and criticize another persons choice in a pet frog. Just seems like either snobbery or silliness to me.
And God said , Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth , which the waters brought forth abundantly , after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And God blessed them, saying , Be fruitful , and multiply , and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
Your mixing of these frogs is not at all like dogs, cats or other animals that can reproduce across morphs. It encourages others to hybridize them and causes them to die off faster from this earth. Thus you are working against God's design for them on this earth. If you truly value God's Word above all else, you will rescind your position and stop foolish arguments which benefit no one.

I will say no more or have a foolish argument with you about this any further.