Where does one look in a wetland for Spring Peeper tads? I know a wetland that has hundreds calling, even a lot just a week ago. Wetland is mostly cattails, up to 3-4 feet deep, some shallower areas with thck grass
Just scoop around in the water especially around the plants.
Edit you profile, there is an option there for a signature.
Well, I waded throught there yesterday and could not find a single tad. It seems Crystal found a tad in wetland in Maine.
What kind of dip net should I use? Can you recommend one? Something more "professional"? I just use a $1 butterfly net. I did find several invertebrates and some tiny, tiny fish. I heard the Jim McGrath, a naturalist here in Michigan, say that if you hear Spring Peepers, you hear them saying "There are no fish here!". I guess he meant larger fish.
Thats too big for a net... I would just get a large dip net from the store. OR you could make your own. Take the butter fly net and take the "net" out. Then get some mesh and just strap the sides on and use that. Make sure the mesh is very long. :P so you can make sure you get the tads. The mesh should have small small holes. Like the size of a dot.
Being a very small species in stature, I am willing to bet since you found fish there, you won't find tadpoles. Find some vernal pools and see what you can scoop out of them. Last year I managed to scoop out a spotted salamander larva, that I raised up. The damn thing is huge now!
BTW, I finally caught what I am pretty sure are Spring Peeper tads. Found a pond where I heard quite a bit of peeping. Since I had already did som sweeps near the edges of ponds like that, I figured they must be near the center or deepest part. And, since the water level receeded quite a bit since then, they must be concentrated. And there was little vegetations to get in the way of my flimsy butterfly net - just what appeared to be 'grass' growing from the bottom of the pond. And, since I didn't see them, I figured they must be right at or just under the loose leaves at the bottom. So I some deep swoops with a butterly net. Success at last! Yay! I think I'll try to raise them to sexaul activity size. Seems if I didn't get some mud from the bottom, I didn't get them. 7 tads, about 1.5 - 2 ".
It's very late for Spring Peeper tadpoles - they're almost certainly all on land now.
Founder of Frogforum.net (2008) and Caudata.org (2001)
Oh, and they just stopped peeping about 2-3 weeks ago.
Plus, Gray Treefrogs are right in the middle of breeding - no tads of them. Green Frogs are about done, so they haven't hatched. American Toads have bred, but their tads are are smaller and darker in color. Wood Frogs are done, but their tads are smaller and different color. I suppose they MIGHT be N. Leopard Frog tads, but I don't kmow what their tad look like, and I never heard them in that pond..... O.K., I just looked at pics on the web, and N. Leopard Frog eggs appear to be nearly all light brownish-gray, with specks of dark in them. I believe those are the only anurans that breed in that area.
But Spring Peeper tads are large! Very large for the size of the frog. I don't see why they would be "persecuted" all that much by Gambusia. American Toads definintely breed in that wetland, and almost every year, when I walk through a certain area, I see them leaving it en masse (and sadly, I step on them cuz' they are so close together). My point being that if those small toad tads can make it, then Gambusia probably wouldn't have a whole lot of effect on Spring Peeper tads.
I have a couple formal journal articles on Gambusia and frogs. I'll have to read them.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)