As I am on my phone I cannot provide a link, but if you are ignoring this issue, have a go at the recent updates to New Mexico's amphibian pet laws. Yes, you can get permits for some species if you do not mind paying out a few grand. No, you can not yet permits as the bulk of species are blanket banned...
Watching FrogTV because it is better when someone else has to maintain the enclosure!
Hate to double post, but there are some gems in here I did not get a chance to cover because my roommate and I are hot-seating on the only internet connection.
And where is this published? When i write a term paper, that is completely unpublishable, I have to use more than that per page just to avoid being accused of academic fraud.John if you would like I wrote scientific review article over Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. It's long, but I assure you I did an excellent job on it and have a full page of around 15-20 references that I used. Let me know, because maybe it could be posted under a link or something.
I would imagine they would be destroyed. Treating requires a course of fungicide treatment that is likely to kill the frog anyway,My question I will ask when the time comes is, what happens when a shipment tests positive? Will the animals be treated or destroyed?
There is not ban going into place. No one is persecuting people who keep frogs.If a ban goes into place will they be required to give up our names and have our animals destroyed while everyone else keeps theirs because they don't know about them? I am second guessing registering any more.
Take off the tinfoil hat.I know they will be coming after me - after all I keep a few of those fungus spreading frogs that will eventually destroy the world.
They already are. Or have you not been paying attention to the Amphibian ARK?Seriously, the problem with groups like Defenders of Wildlife, they don't see the benefit of captive breeding programs. I would like to see zoos and other serious amphibian hobbyists get together and work on saving these animals.
That having been said, the proper place for amphibians to continue existing is not in captivity. It is where they are supposed to be. In the wild. That does not preclude keeping them in captivity, but when you have to maintain them in captivity in order to keep the species alive like we do Axolotl's you have failed and are merely trying to stave off the inevitable.
... Unless the species in question has been a lab rat for 200 years like the Axolotl and Xenopus.
Such as? Who on here has the resources required to breed say... Massive numbers of Rana muscosa? Do you have environmental growth chambers and other apparati used to induce reproduction? Do you know how to perform artificial fertilization with frogs?Terry, i could not agree more. If I could figure out a way to convince the herpetologists and zoos once and for all that there are a good many "amatures" around doing real work with these animals that is just as valid as the work they are doing, I would. I feel this gap will ultimately doom the species the "big" budgets ignore.
Do you do research into the underlying causes of amphibian declines so that captive bred specimens can be re-released?
What percentage of animals bred by hobbyists would do anything but go to other hobbyists? Practically none. The only successful population reintroduction programs I have ever heard of have been done by professionals. Unless there is a group of hobbyists raising condors or whooping cranes I dont know of. As a matter of fact AZGF and the Phoenix Zoo (along with the Fort Worth Zoo) are doing a very good job breeding large numbers of Lithobates chiricahuensis. It is professionals keeping amphibian species such as the entire genus Atelopus from being eaten alive by Chytrid Fungus, not hobbyists.
Frankly your statement is laughable.
What pettiness? The idea that we, the people who usually spend our entire lives as hobbyists and then go to school for 9-12 years (depending on program) and then study amphibians professionally might know what we are talking about a tad better than someone who keeps a few Pyxicephalus or Bombina?The sheer pettiness of the scientific community...
That people do not even take the time to read the rules proposed by the FWS before spouting off is mind blowing. The rule being proposed is in principle the same thing done with food animals. You know that FDA inspection stamp on the packages of meat you buy? It is pretty much like that. I suppose the epidemiologists, vets, and agricultural scientists who contribute to this form of regulation are being petty, and think themselves more knowledgeable than those who raise cows as pets who may be hampered if old Betsy dies and they want to take the meat to market without it being inspected first.
Nevermind of course the damage that could be done from Mad Cow, or pathogenic E. coli stains.
What? You actually want people shipping around animals infected with chytrid?Please do, I have never really gotten involved in stuff like this but I will go to war over this one.
Again... READ THE RULE CHANGE!
Or I can just post the text of New Mexico's new laws, complete with commentary for those who are not fluent in legalese.As I am on my phone I cannot provide a link, but if you are ignoring this issue, have a go at the recent updates to New Mexico's amphibian pet laws. Yes, you can get permits for some species if you do not mind paying out a few grand. No, you can not yet permits as the bulk of species are blanket banned...
I see nothing in here that is objectionable, and it does nothing to stop people from trading in things already in the state.19.35.7.8 IMPORTATION OF LIVE NON-DOMESTICATED ANIMALS: It shall be unlawful to import any live non-domesticated animal into New Mexico without first obtaining appropriate permit(s) issued by the director except those animals identified within the species importation list group I. Permits will only be issued when all application requirements and provisions have been met. Failure to adhere to or violation of permit provisions may result in the applicant/importer becoming ineligible for importation(s). The pendency or determination of any administrative action or the pendency or determination of a criminal prosecution for the same is not a bar to the other.
[19.35.7.8 NMAC - N, 7-30-10]
Oh wait? You mean you actually need to prove to the state that you can take care of and contain animals that may cause damage to you, others, or if released... the environment? Shock! The Horror! You mean you cannot have animals as pets that are endangered in other states, federally, or internationally protected? WOW. I am shocked! This law is so horrendously draconian it is sickening!A. Species Importation List: The director of the New Mexico department of game and fish shall develop a species importation list. The species importation list shall be established, maintained, updated or amended by the director as species information and concerns become available and are identified. The species importation list shall be grouped into the following minimum importation “groups” based on the following criteria:
(1) Species importation list group I are designated domesticated animals and do not require an importation permit;
(2) Species importation list group II may be for live non-domesticated animals that are not known to be either invasive or dangerous and do not present a known risk to the health, safety or well-being of the public, domestic livestock or to native wildlife and their habitats.
(3) Species importation list group III may be for live non-domesticated animals that present minimal or manageable concerns that will require specific provisions that must be met prior to issuing an importation permit to address health, safety or well-being of the public, domestic livestock or to native wildlife and their habitats.
(4) Species importation list group IV may be for live non-domesticated animals that are considered dangerous, invasive, undesirable, state or federal listed threatened, endangered, C.I.T.E.S. appendix 1 or a furbearer. The importation of these species are prohibited for the general public but may be allowed for, scientific study, department approved restoration and recovery plans, zoological display, temporary events/entertainment, use as service animal or by a qualified expert.
(5) Any species of live non-domesticated animal not currently on the species importation list will be designated group IV until such time as another determination is made by the director.
You mean for species that might be problematic within the state of New Mexico, like Bullfrogs or something, you have to show that they will be securely housed and that they are free of Chytrid Fungus-for which bullfrogs serve as asymptomatic carriers? Tyrants!APPLICATION FOR IMPORTATION:
A. Any applicant requesting an importation permit for non-domesticated animals must submit the following information with the application:
(1) a containment or confinement plan indicating where and how the species will be maintained;
(2) a current and valid certificate from an accredited veterinarian certifying that each animal or rearing facility of origin has been inspected and is in good general health, disease free or that each animal or rearing facility of origin tests disease free for any specific disease(s) following the testing requirements and procedures as identified by the department during the application process, except;
So... the facility of origin or who you buy the animal from in-state can comply with this law so that you dont need to do all of the legwork yourself? How reasonable.(a) the department may approve an animal supplier that is currently enrolled in an accredited animal breeding program or facility health monitoring standards such as NPIP, AZA, or other government sanctioned program;
(b) the department may approve detailed and verifiable facility of origin health monitoring plans and records to be submitted by an organization(s) in lieu of a health or rearing facility inspection certificate from an accredited veterinarian;
Oh heaven forbid that the state make sure you are not doing anything illegal...(3) proof from the county and city into which the animal will be imported and held that possession of the animal is allowed;
(4) proof that all necessary federal permits have been obtained;
(5) proof that the requested species does not possess or have the immediate potential to carry infectious or contagious diseases and;
You mean if you find disease in your stock, you have to report it? Oh no!(7) any importing person or entity must notify the department of game and fish within 24 hours of any disease indications or symptoms that manifest themselves among the imported animals.
And if the animal is dangerous you have to make reasonable assurances as to safety, and deal with liability?B. Additional conditions for the importation of a dangerous animal; applicant shall agree to the following provisions before an importation permit is approved:
(1) enter into a department approved written agreement releasing the department from liability;
(2) agree to meet all department approved posted warning requirements;
(3) agree to provide a department approved written warning to any person receiving such animal;
(4) government agencies or other entities as designated by the director may be exempted from the liability or warning requirements in this subsection.
C. All application fees are non-refundable.
Certainly New Mexico's new laws are horribly draconian and target private collectors and are not in any way intended to regulate those who import large numbers of animals from known suppliers into the state...
These are not baseball cards. They are animals which can in some instances be dangerous, carry disease, and to whom we have certain moral obligations-not only to them, but wild populations within the state. Regulation is necessary.
Please stop treating the other posters like children, and tone down the sarcasm. Your approach/attitude is just annoying, not productive, so even if you have good points to make, no one is going to pay attention to them.
Founder of Frogforum.net (2008) and Caudata.org (2001)
You are the Admin. I will do as you request. Though my personality precludes completely getting rid of the sarcasm. That would be impossible. I do however feel inclined to defend my actions in this manner.
I am of the opinion that an argument deserves to be addressed in a manner proportionate to its merit. If an argument is rational and well informed, but in my view incorrect, then I have no problem not patronizing my opponent. If however an argument is ill informed and irrational, not only will I shred the argument, but I find that sarcasm and general snark are excellent ways to make someone see how asinine their position is-if they are ever inclined to change their mind.
If someone cannot separate their pride from what is true, then that is their problem. Not mine. Such individuals remove themselves from reasoned discussion by definition. They are simply incapable of having one, regardless of my tone. They will resort to emotion and pig-headedness eventually anyway.
Iratus, it's possible to discuss a topic, make a point, and even disagree without being offensive in the process. Somehow 99.9% of the people on the forum manage that. You too can accomplish this with little effort, and make your point. In fact, you will be more persuasive if you do.
Founder of Frogforum.net (2008) and Caudata.org (2001)
I am naturally prone to sarcasm and contempt. Sometimes people are thin-skinned. I can tone it down, but not kill it (it just wouldn't be me if I did). If it will further discussion, I can remove some of it from the above, and repost. Particularly if that will get people to actually address the argument-and read the rules in question.
There is a question of post-deletion which I see has happened with some of those by one named Crotalus (my roommate for the summer, and collaborator). If the posts were deleted for TOS violations, accidentally or through computer glitch (board reverting to backups or something) then that is one thing. Deleting them for the purposes of censoring is another and even if legal and within one's rights as admin/staff/mod is not morally OK. It would be nice if that was clarified. He is standing over my shoulder wondering where his posts went.
As you request:
If you wrote a scientific review, then you would not have made that mistake regarding the origin and time span of chytrid fungus infection. The earliest known museum specimens found to be infected were Xenopus originating in Africa.See this is another example of people over reacting and NOT thinking. The problem of Chytrid is not because of people raising and keeping amphibians. The fungus is present every world in the world and has been probably for centuries.
John if you would like I wrote scientific review article over Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. It's long, but I assure you I did an excellent job on it and have a full page of around 15-20 references that I used. Let me know, because maybe it could be posted under a link or something.
Origin of the amphibian chytrid fungus. [Emerg Infect Dis. 2004] - PubMed result
No one is coming after your frogs. There is no ban being proposed. Read the rule change proposed. It is a chytrid testing requirement for those that ship frogs across state lines and into the country. That is it. The test is cheap, and can be done by a third party lab.If a ban goes into place will they be required to give up our names and have our animals destroyed while everyone else keeps theirs because they don't know about them? I am second guessing registering any more.
And a ban is not even remotely what is occurringI think the press release makes a good point - when have you known legislators to care enough to fairly regulate for a topic like this of marginal voting consequence? Easier to ban outright.
CA has major problems with invasive species. Banning species that if released (and several have) that can harm native populations is reasonable. Same with Washington State. Bullfrogs. All I need to say about the problems with that state.Add in the detrimental effect of a token few zealots with big funding backing them and things like the California Ambystomid Ban and the Washington State Invasive Aquatic Species Ban happen.
I will need to check the CA laws, I know Axolotls are banned because if introduced you get a 14 inch long voracious salamander lava that can easily survive in the state and eat native amphibian populations out of existence.
Though other ambystomids as far as I know can still be used for Bait.
These rules will actually economically encourage local captive breeding. No consumer wants a chance to have the animal they ship in infected with chytrid, and it is much easier to breed your stock and sell off the clean animals than have to continually test wild caught specimens.Seriously, the problem with groups like Defenders of Wildlife, they don't see the benefit of captive breeding programs. I would like to see zoos and other serious amphibian hobbyists get together and work on saving these animals.
This is personally offensive to me as well as ignorant, so I will keep the tone of the original.Terry, i could not agree more. If I could figure out a way to convince the herpetologists and zoos once and for all that there are a good many "amatures" around doing real work with these animals that is just as valid as the work they are doing, I would. I feel this gap will ultimately doom the species the "big" budgets ignore.
The sheer pettiness of the scientific community and the zealots' lobby powers will ultimately be the downfall of us all.
What pettiness? The idea that we, the people who usually spend our entire lives as hobbyists and then go to school for 9-12 years (depending on program) and then study amphibians professionally might know what we are talking about a tad better than someone who keeps a few Pyxicephalus or Bombina?
That people do not even take the time to read the rules proposed by the FWS before spouting off is mind blowing. The rule being proposed is in principle the same thing done with food animals. You know that FDA inspection stamp on the packages of meat you buy? It is pretty much like that. I suppose the epidemiologists, vets, and agricultural scientists who contribute to this form of regulation are being petty, and think themselves more knowledgeable than those who raise cows as pets who may be hampered if old Betsy dies and they want to take the meat to market without it being inspected first.
Who on here has the resources required to breed say... Massive numbers of Rana muscosa? Do you have environmental growth chambers and other apparati used to induce reproduction? Do you know how to perform artificial fertilization with frogs?
Do you do research into the underlying causes of amphibian declines so that captive bred specimens can be re-released?
What percentage of animals bred by hobbyists would do anything but go to other hobbyists? Practically none. The only successful population reintroduction programs I have ever heard of have been done by professionals. Unless there is a group of hobbyists raising condors or whooping cranes I dont know of. As a matter of fact AZGF and the Phoenix Zoo (along with the Fort Worth Zoo) are doing a very good job breeding large numbers of Lithobates chiricahuensis. It is professionals keeping amphibian species such as the entire genus Atelopus from being eaten alive by Chytrid Fungus, not hobbyists.
Hobbyists do an excellent job developing ways to raise small numbers of amphibians in an inexpensive manner and getting finicky species to breed. They dont however have the facilities to properly do a captive breeding program. Those that do can properly be classified as professionals and typically have decades of experience and/or formal education and training. Just think about what doing vet treatment for all of those animals requires. If your colony comes down with red-leg you have to have baytril on hand which is script only. If not you have to resort to salt baths. You have to have quarantine space etc.
To set up breeding facilities for Booroolong Frogs took tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars in initial investment.
Making something illegal cannot stop it completely, but it can stop large scale movements. Someone shipping a friend their ceratophrys tadpoles is a far cry from the mass shipment of bullfrogs done by Carolina Biological Supply, or commercial shipment of frog legs from Paraguay or domestic bullfrog farms.Well this is the first time I read something like this and I see alot of good points but ima put it like this; as with anything else they ban or make illegal people are still going to find a way to do it no matter what only to get rid of it years later. For example marijuana is illegal yet in some state its becoming legal..why?Ive witnessed first hand what it could do to your brain an ima be honest I use to smoke it but not no more. Anyway to pass this (in my opinion) is a waste of time. Im upfor making the world better but some things are pointless unless they really tend to enforce this to the full extent.
My sarcasm was perfectly appropriate dealing with this, because even a cursory reading of the NM statute shows it is not true.As I am on my phone I cannot provide a link, but if you are ignoring this issue, have a go at the recent updates to New Mexico's amphibian pet laws. Yes, you can get permits for some species if you do not mind paying out a few grand. No, you can not yet permits as the bulk of species are blanket banned...
I think its people in general. Just look at the big uproar over Healthcare reform. The right had a lot of people so scared over it. Did any one of these scared, paranoid people actually read it? Probably not, its too long to read, so they listened to the pundits and got angry.
I have read the proposal and I agree with it, so does Frank Indiviglio. Spot testing needs to be done on imports. Not every frog needs to be tested, just a few from each shipment. There is no need at this point to panic or get paranoid.
I think the herp community is particularly bad though. Particularly the snake people. There is a libertarian streak the size of Siberia, as angry as the Gaza Strip, and as short-sighted as a naked mole rat within that community. They are ideologically opposed to any form of regulation whatsoever. It is ridiculous.
I deleted the posts between Crotalus and Paul (one of our moderators) because none of the posts were constructive or contributed anything to the discussion of the issue at hand. There is no legal question and I have complete discretion to remove posts that are not even vaguely on topic - the posts were silly.
Regarding your other points - I actually agree with you for the most part, though frankly I think you give herpetologists and zoos far greater praise than they deserve. Most zoo personnel know what they need to know to look after the animals in their care, and that's about it. There are exceptions (I am friends with a few) but zoos pay very little and therefore rarely recruit people who are at the top of their game.
Regarding scientists, as a research scientist with a PhD, a considerable list of research publications in peer reviewed journals, as well as other publications outside of my research but related to amphibians, and having worked in several countries, I can tell you that again, most scientists have relatively little knowledge beyond their own research focus, and state bodies do not pay enough to have many knowledgeable and experienced scientists at their disposal. Don't get me wrong, I truly wish you were correct in your view of scientists - that would be a nice country in which to live.
Founder of Frogforum.net (2008) and Caudata.org (2001)
One other point I would like to echo from previous posters. Zoos and academics don't give much respect or credence to hobbyists. I can understand their skepticism to a degree, but I know of several hobbyists who accomplish things such as breeding rare species first, finding range extensions for known species, etc. Whether they like it or not, many hobbyists are treasure troves of breeding knowledge and experience that could be utilized for the benefit of rare species. Thankfully, Amphibian Ark's director recognizes this, and through people like him we are starting to wake up so-called professionals that they have respect to give to hobbyists and a lot to learn from them too.
Founder of Frogforum.net (2008) and Caudata.org (2001)
If that is the case I will not press the matter.I deleted the posts between Crotalus and Paul (one of our moderators) because none of the posts were constructive or contributed anything to the discussion of the issue at hand. There is no legal question and I have complete discretion to remove posts that are not even vaguely on topic - the posts were silly.
True enough. However there is the matter of resources. If you want to start up a large captive breeding colony of some ranid frog or hylid, It requires a significant investment in space, money etc. A hobbyist cant do that. A hobbyist may (and often do) figure out how to get animals breeding on a small scale (Rain chambers, photoperiod etc) but to pull a species back from the brink of extinction and not have them later succumb to inbreeding depression is another matter. A lot of species also have issues when being re-released with disease. This is much easier to control in a professional facility like the one I was not allowed to enter at the Fort Worth Zoo for fear of chytrid contamination (The on at the phoenix zoo is another matter )Regarding your other points - I actually agree with you for the most part, though frankly I think you give herpetologists and zoos far greater praise than they deserve. Most zoo personnel know what they need to know to look after the animals in their care, and that's about it. There are exceptions (I am friends with a few) but zoos pay very little and therefore rarely recruit people who are at the top of their game.
To really get something done on a large scale, you need technicians and other support personnel. Vets on staff, whole nine yards. An individual biologist may not be any more competent than a hobbyist at husbandry, but zoo facility has resources a hobbyist lacks-if only due to sheer monetary investment.
Well that is why I was referring specifically to those who do research into amphibian declines and their causes. State agencies dont do a very good job on the pure research end, and reports filed within them are a pain to get access to. However someone at a university doing research on say... pesticide toxicity to amphibians is a good person to talk to. A hobbyist setting up a breeding program will not know anything more than the general broad trends they read in the news and in trade mags. They wont have access or the expertise to be able to find a good release site. They cannot test for chytrid to example to see if their site is contaminated.Regarding scientists, as a research scientist with a PhD, a considerable list of research publications in peer reviewed journals, as well as other publications outside of my research but related to amphibians, and having worked in several countries, I can tell you that again, most scientists have relatively little knowledge beyond their own research focus, and state bodies do not pay enough to have many knowledgeable and experienced scientists at their disposal. Don't get me wrong, I truly wish you were correct in your view of scientists - that would be a nice country in which to live.
I have never experienced this, and if I have it does not rise to the level of pettyness. I fully recognize the ability of a hobbyist to give us information on how to breed animals that no one in the scientific community really works with. The hobbyists that do that though as a proportion of the community are few and far between and those that can do it can hardly be considered amatures.One other point I would like to echo from previous posters. Zoos and academics don't give much respect or credence to hobbyists
While I will not buy into your sarcasm and arrogance, I will point out your quote referenced the wrong law for New Mexico. The current 2010 proposal as seen on the NMFG site explains the new permit system. This is being implemeted as we speak.
Watching FrogTV because it is better when someone else has to maintain the enclosure!
The 2010 version is not substantially different.
The fees are as follows:
(a) class 1: importation of 1 to 5 animals 25.00 (b) class 2: importation of 6 to 99 animals 75.00 (c) class 3: importation of greater than 100 animals 300.00
Thousands of dollars yes... Of course. You are only a full order of magnitude off. If you are an importer you may have to eat the cost of disease testing, but having that testing done is perfectly reasonable.
I do think that more hobbyists need to read more of the bills being proposed for themselves, but that is true about anything that is going on in the political world. And maybe not as many hobbyists are contributing to the conservation of a species as they think, but not everyone who enjoys keeping frogs and observing their antics needs to be a vet or a scientist. Some hobbyists my contribute to conservation of a local species and never be recognized for it. One of the best things one can do to conserve the local species is to have a fish free-suitable small pond for amphibians to breed in , and I know many people who do.
Now regarding this bill, yes sometimes these things may start out as sensible proposals and turn into things like "draconian" bans, and yes most legislators don't understand the joy a herp hobbyist gets from caring for these critters and may not take it into consideration, but at this stage, testing IMPORTED animals for a devastating disease is not a bad idea. What all the concerned breeders and keepers need to do form this point is stay updated and know what is going on for themselves, and write letters and make cases as necessary. Right now the legislation you could say is equivilent to needing to prove that your pet pit bull is not a viscious killer before you give him to someone else, not banning them from being owned by responsible people. So take a deep breath. Ignore hot headed, arrogant sarcasm, and become and stay informed on the subject.
Agreed like that ol' saying says "you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar". I do see his point of view about the whole laws and such. I seem to agree with him because not only did he bring proof, he backs everything up. But trust me you catch m ore flies with honey than vinegar. Iam sure you can do it.
Have you actually tried to catch flies with honey? Well have you? If so, were you successful?
No. Lol I end up getting peanut butter since its my least favorite food and I put a slab on it on a paper towel. Leave it out. Flies get stuck in the tar, I get either a fly swatter, some bleach, or any chems, or just get fire and burn them up. xD Iam like the fly murderer. Lol its like HALP ME! A MAD MAN IS BURNING ME! AWRARARW D; Iam dying! I tried to eat some peanut butter and got stuck on it now Iam being murdarared. xD lolol
OK that was disturbing.
LOL! Its not as disturbing as seeing a friend eating crickets, or other insects. I know this kid who does it. Its gross as hell. I dont understand how his girlfriend kisses him. xDDD I mean like he eats crickets for money. Lol. Oh and Its not as disturbing as me saying id use that peanut butter with the flies and make a sandwhich out of it and give it to a random person. Lol or a friend. xD hahaha then tell em what that sandwhich had and run. xD
OK thats gross and I little bit disturbing. My appetite is ruined.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)