I can't believe this, I'm stumped. A week or so ago, I took a picture of my frog showing a clear nuptual pad and assumed he was a male. While she was growing up, I always assumed she was female, she eats alot, has a really rounded head and is a really slow grower.
Now I'm beyond confused, a week ago he was a he, this week, no sign of a nuptual pad and she looks like a she... So yes, I am beyond confused. I've never read about dissapearing nuptual pads, I din'd even know such a thing was possible.
So I'm going to post alot of pictures underneath here, and I'm hoping the experts can confirm my baby is a female. My frog is exactly 2.7" or 7cm right now, and has never shown signs of a vocal sack, I also haven't heard a teenage croak yet, I would recognise it since my other frogs are all adult.
The first picture shows the "nuptual pad".
![]()
Honestly doesn't look like a pad to me in that first shot. I had same kind of thing happen with my female, I thought I saw a pad one day, got all excited and checked closer a few days later and it was really nothing
Sent from my LG-P930 using Tapatalk 2
2.0 Bombina orientalis
1.0 Bufo americanus
0.1.1 Ceratophrys cranwelli
0.1 Xenopus laevis
All my arachnids and other inverts listed in my profile
Yeah I can understand, but I've checked all my males while growing up, their nuptual pads all started the same way, but never dissapeared. I've checked my picture about a hundred times. It's not dirt and if it's not a nuptual pad, what was it?![]()
Hm... Was it just on the one foot? If it didn't show up on both sides maybe it could've been a slightly irritated area (I know not likely given the coloring) or just some of the slight pattern-changes that happen as they get older? Still kind of weird.
3.0 Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis
1.1 Thamnophis cyrtopsis ocellatus
0.1 Ceratophrys cranwelli
1.0 Litoria caerulea
0.1 Terrapene carolina
0.1 Python regius
0.1 Grammostola rosea
0.0.1 Brachypelma smithi
0.1 Hogna carolinensis
Nuptial pads can fade on males during the off season, but they don't disappear completely. I don't believe that was a nuptial pad at all. They are usually much larger even when first developing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)