
Originally Posted by
Geo
I would like to apologize if my participation in this thread has triggered a sensitive issue. This thread is actually too short for anyone to get too upset in comparison to other threads I have read lol.
When participating in any hobby there will sometimes be people taking a stance on either side of the fence for any particular aspect of said hobby. Some people take a particular stance based from experience and knowledge, others because of personal preferences, others because they went with a particularly appealing trend, maybe to fit into a particular community and some out of ignorance or what have you.
This is my humble opinion and it is only that but no one should own an animal just to breed them. They should care for an animal because they are concerned for their well being, they appreciate and understand that we humans being (the more intelligent and compassionate of all known species) have a commitment to act as stewards to any animal that comes into our care, that they are interested in studying and understanding that creature to the fullest extent of their abilities, and that they choose to do what they can to make life as healthy for the creature as they can. If breeding the animal helps in some manner for it and it's particular species to survive, especially if it is in some way endangered, then all the more power to the caretaker. If breeding allows for that animal to become plentiful and available to others who would like to care for such as well then that is good too.
"Standard conformist rules" are a part of the animal caretaking hobby because it is derived from many years of experience of a large group of devoted and knowledgeable people. When something becomes an accepted standard it is because it has been proven time and time again to be the better way to do something. It has been shown to be efficient and effective regarding the wellbeing of the animal in question. Conforming to this standard (even though there truly isn't any such thing) shows that the caretaker acknowledges that maybe just maybe others know a bit more then they do and that they lack the experiences that others may have had in the hobby. As for rules, there are no rules in this or any other hobby unless the person perceives the preferred methodologies others have come to use as rules.
Now having said that about conformity I am all for experimentation as well but and I need to stress this THE EXPERIMENTATION SHOULD NEVER EVER JEOPARDIZE THE WELLBEING OF THE ANIMALS BEING CARED FOR. This doesn't mean anyone here is harming their animals, just stating it as some people have the opinion that these creatures are disposable. If I fail at my experiment then hey I can go get some more - wrong and very inhumane perspective.
Long term care of any creatures suggests that for the caretaker to be efficient and effective in their interactions with the creatures that they care for that they be aware of potential dangers that exists for the animal as well as potential mistakes that can occur that may threaten the well being of the critter. To choose to ignore obtaining a basic knowledge of genetics, biological threats, social behaviours is just plain and simple ignorance on behalf of the wannabe caretaker. Some of the easiest ways to learn of these things is through books, videos and better yet the massive collection of experience obtained by previous caretakers that can be found in forums like this one as well as several others. I fail to see how anyone would care for any animal without coming across this issue at some point, usually shortly after obtaining the animal and maybe something is going wrong. An aware and educated caretaker is a humane and effective caretaker.
Yes, there are folks who maintain inadequate housing for their animals but sometimes small enclosures may be preferred - easier to clean and prevent health issues, breeding is more easier due to close proximity of the animals to one another, etc. Sometimes a particular species will dictate what type of setup is needed, sometimes it is more or less entirely up to the caretaker as to what they prefer to make available. If you have the resources, experience and knowledge to offer your animals larger environs for them to live in then all the better. No matter if the housing is small or large each can have its own unique set of challenges and requirements. Some assume that the larger the housing the less likelihood for mistakes. At first it may seem like that but that is not always the case as some caretakers may learn if certain things should happen. If their track record is good then I am pleased that they have been successful in their endeavors.
In the end it is up to the person what they care to do but hopefully they will keep in mind what many others have found beneficial for the animals and until they gain more experience and knowledge they will try their hand at the tried and true methodology that is easily available to them. I don't believe anyone here has ever to my knowledge claimed outright to be an "expert" (although we do have a few folks who via academia and life experience are valid "experts" in their particular fields) BUT they are definitely skilled and knowledgeable in what they do.
Many of the members here as well as the Moderators are all for discussing and sharing and sometimes we have differences of opinions but we do our best to avoid allowing it to become heated by choosing how we express ourselves because it does us no good to get lost in the negativity. It takes away from the hobby a bit and there are young folks here trying their best to be good caretakers and they need to see others demonstrate proper etiquette and how to discuss certain topics that benefit everyone.