
Originally Posted by
Jakub Urbanski
Well, i have to agree that a mistake in aestivation might be dangerous. Anyway - in an artificial environment we cannot control all parameters of the environment to the same extent. It is relatively easy with the humidity and temperature, but other factors such as atmospheric pressure are beyond our control. In Poland where I live, despite so called "moderate zone" we experience rapid changes of the pressure corrsponding to the weather changes. My observation is that if we do not correlate the outside weater pattern with the microclimate of the close environment, we expose the frogs to the stress. For example If we do not let them estivate in the season corresponding to the dry period, they tend to shed their skin more often... The stress make them more prone to the skin disease and infections, also they tend to die unexpectedly due to some kind of stress more frequently than the frogs subjected to estivation.
Physiology of all cold-blooded animals is highly dependent on weather conditions, and the estivation is a natural response to the changing environmental conditions of the dry period.
I fully agree with Lija and Carlos that it is hard to provide a hard evidence without the systematic scientific approach and long term observations. We did not performed large scale screening yet, though I am really tempted to do so and since we have enough frogs to do so, I will probably start the experiment with some of our froglets.
And what prompted me to think so? We do keep frogs for a couple of years (10 or so), but some threeyears ago I've opened a huge (as for the Polish standards) farm of feeder insects. With the virtually unlimited supply of live food, we have decided to start breeding the frogs on a large scale, to provide the "local" alternative to the US and Japan imported animals on the POlish and subsequently, EU Market. So we have started to gather a breeding group, buying all adult/subadult frogs available around. There were two main sources - pet shops, where the animals were given least care, less food and were subjected to the unvoluntary estivation just because of the recklesness of the shopkeepers and the second source - amateur keepers, usually omitting the estivation (afraid of the potential risks and willing to avoid the "boring" periods of their pets life). After two years of breeding attempts - I can say that the frogs form petshops were much more resistant to the changes of environment, more productive (ie. in means of a number of eggs, and rate of fertilization) than their counterparts of the same size/weight purchased from the Ã*amateour keepers. Also they response to the estivation and rain chamber was more straightforward... Of course a group of 50 or so frogs is too small to draw any far-fetched conclusions but... Frogs that were kind of used to the changing environmental conditions and the "dry periods" generally tend to be healthier and more productive in means of a number of eggs produced and mating activity - and in my opinion it is the only way to assess the potential benefits of the estivation...