Quote Originally Posted by Malduroque View Post
Dearest Crystal6,

Again in trying to prove something exists as opposed to not existing, the burden of proof falls squarely on you (geez, this sounds just like the atheist vs god debate).

For instance, I did a search on 'frogs and differential calculus' and 'frogs can't do differential calculus'. I found nothing aside from calculus tutoring sites (for humans I presume). So, by your thinking, I was unable to prove that frogs can't do differential calculus equations?

I ask you to read Kurt's most recent post in this thread. Kurt is a legitimate Herpetologist. Is that scientific enough for ya'?

Finally, for someone who claimed to not want to argue the topic, you've certainly remained quite active in the argument.
*groan* Okay first: Do I think frogs get lonely? No. No I do not. Do I think frogs can feel SOME emotions? Yes. Yes I do. Do I think they feel warm fuzzy feelings towards me? No. And neither does Kurt from what I can tell. So there is no arguing to be done. Unless you want to debate which emotions they can feel, if any. You seem to think they can feel none, Kurt seems to think they can feel some. (Like lust or hunger.) I say maybe they can also feel satisfaction after they eat. But whatever! People can think whatever they want because without proof it's just opinionated stuff. Unless Kurt says "here's a link to an article about this" I say, who cares who thinks what?

And that's really all I have left to say on this matter. I'm not here to prove frogs can do ANYTHING and apparently neither are you. So since I'm not looking to prove what they can or can't do and you aren't, why argue? No offense meant! I shut up now!