Pacman eating frog!!

[GrifTheGreat]

No. Key word singular. Thats why I capitalized the word "WAS". "Was" being the past tense indicator that obviously I was referring to the frog that had been eaten.

But there are multiple frogs being eaten. The way your question was worded is what is causing confusion. Should have asked "What kind of frog was being used as a feeder?" I'm not bashing you, just playing around. Hope you weren't offended.

[Maharg]

The only way I think it would be a confusing question is if the Cornuta had passed away. I thought the use of the key word WAS had made it pretty clear. But no offense taken.

[GrifTheGreat]

The only way I think it would be a confusing question is if the Cornuta had passed away. I thought the use of the key word WAS had made it pretty clear. But no offense taken.

Since there are multiple frogs the need to differentiate between the two would need to be specified. That's all I was saying.

[Maharg]

Since there are multiple frogs the need to differentiate between the two would need to be specified. That's all I was saying.

Point taken. I can see both sides.

[GrifTheGreat]

Point taken. I can see both sides.

I feel like I bashed your question and am sorry. Didn't meant to.

[Maharg]

I feel like I bashed your question and am sorry. Didn't meant to.

No not at all. Its all good.