Pacman eating frog!!

[Maharg]

They all look like pure Cornuta. But if you're asking what the feeder frogs were then I have no clue.

The key word: What kind of a frog WAS it. Lol. Im aware the predator frog is a Surinam.

[Namio]

The key word: What kind of a frog WAS it. Lol. Im aware the predator frog is a Surinam.

I have to say the subtlety in your question was less than appreciated...

[GrifTheGreat]

The key word: What kind of a frog WAS it. Lol. Im aware the predator frog is a Surinam.

Hey Maharg you mean key "WORDS" right? Lol! Because that was 7 key words Lol!

[GrifTheGreat]

Wow! And I can't. Count because that was 7 key words Lol! Stupid phone!!!

[Namio]

Wow! And I can't. Count because that was 7 key words Lol! Stupid phone!!!

Haha, yeah Grif, just blame it on your phone. Personally I blame your fingers.

[Lija]

beautiful cornutas but I don't appreciate the fact of feeding frogs to them, it is really sad

[lorenjas]

beautiful cornutas but I don't appreciate the fact of feeding frogs to them, it is really sad

I understand the sadness that comes from feeding frogs to frogs, usually I wouldn't advise it due to as others mentioned, Chytrid primarily, however with wild caught Cornuta (as I assume those are) it can be very hard to get them to eat in captivity. One type of food they almost never refuse is another frog. It may be in the same terrarium / container for a day or even a week, but it will be eaten. It also provides enough of a meal so that the frog doesn't need to eat as often and still gets all its nutrients.

Best bet is to get the frogs from a captive bred source and then there's no issue (besides the sadness)

[FriedrichsFrogs]

the frogs being eaten is sad..but those cornatas are really good lookin frogs

[EricIvins]

beautiful cornutas but I don't appreciate the fact of feeding frogs to them, it is really sad

It isn't sad. Cornuta are Frog eaters, plain and simple. They specialize in feeding on other Reptiles and Amphibians, so it's a fact of life for these animals......

[Lija]

It isn't sad. Cornuta are Frog eaters, plain and simple. They specialize in feeding on other Reptiles and Amphibians, so it's a fact of life for these animals......

for one they do eat food other then frogs, feeding them frogs are not just sad but it is also not understandable and not ethical especially for those who breed and own bullfrogs and ACF as pets. Same would go for those people who feed kittens to their boas. I'm sorry I don't understand that and never will.

I personally would never buy WC frog if there is a chance of getting CB, besides feeding and other problems that go with WC i much rather support CB businesses.

[GrifTheGreat]

Haha, yeah Grif, just blame it on your phone. Personally I blame your fingers.

What!! My fingers are magic!! LOL!

[Maharg]

Hey Maharg you mean key "WORDS" right? Lol! Because that was 7 key words Lol!

No. Key word singular. Thats why I capitalized the word "WAS". "Was" being the past tense indicator that obviously I was referring to the frog that had been eaten.

[GrifTheGreat]

No. Key word singular. Thats why I capitalized the word "WAS". "Was" being the past tense indicator that obviously I was referring to the frog that had been eaten.

But there are multiple frogs being eaten. The way your question was worded is what is causing confusion. Should have asked "What kind of frog was being used as a feeder?" I'm not bashing you, just playing around. Hope you weren't offended.

[Maharg]

The only way I think it would be a confusing question is if the Cornuta had passed away. I thought the use of the key word WAS had made it pretty clear. But no offense taken.

[GrifTheGreat]

The only way I think it would be a confusing question is if the Cornuta had passed away. I thought the use of the key word WAS had made it pretty clear. But no offense taken.

Since there are multiple frogs the need to differentiate between the two would need to be specified. That's all I was saying.

[Maharg]

Since there are multiple frogs the need to differentiate between the two would need to be specified. That's all I was saying.

Point taken. I can see both sides.