Petco Reliable Dealer?

[SludgeMunkey]

The number one issue with both company's care sheets for amphibians, and many lizards, is dietary suggestions. Recommending meal worms and wax worms as staple diets is bad news all the way around.
The second most common error is temperature and lighting. While I understand the requirements for each species differs greatly; 80 F with a UVB incandescent bulb for amphibians is just too much bad information on one page to bear.
The third and most glaring error to a self proclaimed exotic pet snob like myself is incorrect, misspelled, or missing scientific names. To me this is the worst error of all as it results in complete failure should a novice herptile owner decide to try and research husbandry and care information.

Now in PetCo and PetSmart's defense, there are innumerable momNpop shops that are just as bad if not worse.

Also, I have yet to meet an employee of either store, anywhere in the country that was not eager to learn proper information about the animals in stock. This is one of the very few reasons I frequent both companies here in the Omaha area. (Well, that and I can take my pugs with me and the manager of one of the stores bent over backwards to get the volume products I need but cannot have shipped in winter.)

[1beataway]

The number one issue with both company's care sheets for amphibians, and many lizards, is dietary suggestions. Recommending meal worms and wax worms as staple diets is bad news all the way around.

Yeah. It would be nice if it said that they should only be fed occasionally. I explain that when I sell reptiles and amphibians, but that doesn't mean any pet store employee in the US does.

The second most common error is temperature and lighting. While I understand the requirements for each species differs greatly; 80 F with a UVB incandescent bulb for amphibians is just too much bad information on one page to bear.

I don't recall that on ours but...I'm usually one who says, "The care guides tell you exactly what temperature and humidity they should be kept at." I'll pay attention on this more, and I'll look through the frog ones next time I get a chance.

The third and most glaring error to a self proclaimed exotic pet snob like myself is incorrect, misspelled, or missing scientific names. To me this is the worst error of all as it results in complete failure should a novice herptile owner decide to try and research husbandry and care information.

This would be a lot harder for me to spot just by looking, but I know that I've had trouble trying to find some animals (not just reptiles/amphibians either) by the common name in the store. I'm not sure what I can do in my store, unless I just to do whatever Kurt does (how does he know all those names? It's pretty amazing), but that would include trying to look up every reptile, amphibian, and fish we sell, and then trying to remember all that I found. And, I'm a college student. I have lots more I'm trying to cram into my head.

[Kurt]

This would be a lot harder for me to spot just by looking, but I know that I've had trouble trying to find some animals (not just reptiles/amphibians either) by the common name in the store. I'm not sure what I can do in my store, unless I just to do whatever Kurt does (how does he know all those names? It's pretty amazing), but that would include trying to look up every reptile, amphibian, and fish we sell, and then trying to remember all that I found. And, I'm a college student. I have lots more I'm trying to cram into my head.

Remembering the names is easy. I know several and not just amphibians, but a lot of reptiles, arachnids, fish, some birds, and some mammals. I also try to keep up on the revisions. I used to write a little column in the NEHS newsletter so many years ago on the subject of taxonomic names versus common names. I would give a list of taxonomic names on one page and the common names on another.

Here's an example. See how many you know. The first ten are frogs, the last ten are not.

Lithobates palustris
Ameerega trivittata
Anaxyrus exsul
Litoria subglandulosa
Hyperolius semidiscus
Hylarana erythraea
Kaloula pulchra
Mantella laevigata
Pseudophryne corroboree
Rhacophorus reinwardtii

Dendroaspis polylepis
Hylobates lar
Turdus migratorius
Brachypelma smithi
Babycurus jacksonii
Thorichthys meeki
Crotalus adamanteus
Pan troglodytes
Ailuronyx jubatus
Herpele multiplicata

[1beataway]

Isn't mantella a type of dart? And doesn't the ones beginning with "hyla" mean a sort of treefrog? Litoria sounds a little familiar, but I'm not sure why. That's the best I can do.

Edit. I was thinking Litoria sounded familiar from the White's, and I found out I was right, but I'm not sure what Litoria you have named.

[Kurt]

Isn't mantella a type of dart? And doesn't the ones beginning with "hyla" mean a sort of treefrog? Litoria sounds a little familiar, but I'm not sure why. That's the best I can do.

Mantellas are not darts. They are similar, but they are not darts Depending on the line of taxonomy you follow they are either in the family Ranidae (true frogs) or in their own family, Mantellidae.

"Hyla" on its own would be a genus of treefrogs, like Hyla versicolor, H. arborea, H. gratiosa, and so on. In this case Hylarana erythraea is not a treefrog.

Litoria subglandulosa is a close relative to Litoria caerulea, so your on the right trail.

Let me know when you give up and I will reveal the answers.

[1beataway]

Let me know when you give up and I will reveal the answers.

I had classes, and now work, so I'll work on it when I get home tonight. I hope you don't reveal the answers before then.

[Kurt]

I won't.