Originally Posted by
cali
Yep- that is all correct.
#1 I am a genius.
#2 If the all genes of animal A are dominant (wich is implausible, but hypothetically possible) over all the genes in animal B, then offspring C would only show characteristics of parent A, nothing of parent B.
Moreover- animal C could be line bred (in theory) for multiple generations, with an eventual outcome of all recessive genetic material of parent B being removed and offspring X ultimately being genetically identical to original parent A, without a trace of parent B. Or animal C could be line bred for multiple generations, with an eventual outcome of all dominant genetic material of parent A being removed and offspring Y ultimately being genetically identical to original parent B, without a trace of parent A.
All of my theories and facts are sound- I stand by everything I've said.
Quote me- PROVE any of it is wrong.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote