Yes. In the long run, you might not want to add an extreme amount of feeders every time, but occasionally, I don't see the problem.
Indeed. A waterfall is just a bowl with a pumpSo you think just a nice size waterfall would be fine and no need for a water bowl then?
First of all, the smaller size is not "better suited" for fewer frogs. They will not benefit from living in a smaller enclosure. However, the 24"x18"x24" is quite a nice size and it'll be a nice size even with 3, or even 4. I would say it's just a matter of how much you actually can spend. The larger (taller) is of course better, but the smaller is still good enough to make a proper home.Originally Posted by J Teezy
Ok, I feel like I should elaborate on pothos-plant a little more, since you do not seem to grasp it's true power. They are the all-round terrarium super-plant. They can be potted in substrate (soil, moss, coco husk, whatever), directly in water, or just without actual potting. They can absorb water through their leaves, and therefore can live and grow practically anywhere. I have two planted pothos, and one purely epiphytic pothos (not planted in any way), which both get their water solely from the ReptiFogger and the ambient humidity. On top of this, they are are extreme climbers, using sticky roots to secure itself to it's surroundings (be it the background, the substrate, other plants, the glass, vines, etc.) and the just continues to climb on. In addition to this, they grow like crazy. Like, crazy crazy. I've actually measured a grow-rate of 3 centimeters for a single stem over a 18 hour period. That was of course extreme, but I promise you it will grow a lot and fast. It's also very easy to just put it where you want it and wait for a week or two, since it'll fasten itself there. Then you can just point it at another direction.Originally Posted by J Teezy
Here's an example of how you can plant a pot and still get it higher up in the tank:
I silicone a cocofiber pot to one side of the tank. However, I almost never water it. It get's what it needs through the ambient humidity.
And here's a picture of what the roots looks like, which it'll use to secure themselves when climbing:
When talking about plants that actually needs to be planted, you can either do it in a pot and hide it, or directly in the substrate. I prefer to use a hidden pot, but it's pretty much up to you and how your enclosure looks like. Here's a picture of I did it:
Hidden pot:
And the same pot when the substrate is removed:
If you want to cover an entire wall with plants, I suggest creeping fig (Ficus pumila). The leaves themselves does not support an adult red-eye, but it can cover an entire wall like a wallpaper, which looks really nice. This could be planted in the substrate (or pot) below the wall and it'll most likely begin to climb its way up. I'm not sure if these can survive solely on a fogger though. I'm using them in my Theloderma corticale enclosure, which uses a misting system.
I have answered this two times already:Originally Posted by J Teezy
Originally Posted by ViperJr
There is one nice aspect to keeping these frogs. The more hiding space you give it, the more you'll actually see it. When a lot of foliage, leaves, branches etc. are present, they will feel secure and hidden, therefore exploring more and being more visible. It might sound strange, but trying to hide them will almost always result in actually seeing them more.Originally Posted by J Teezy
I don't know exactly what kind of materials he uses, but styrofoam is frog-safe, yes. When painting, acrylic can be used without being dangerous to the frogs (just make sure it's completely dried before putting the frogs in. Like, a week or two, minimum). When it comes to silicone, there's some kind that you definitely want to keep away from. From what I've read, "GE silicone II" is the most commonly used for this in the hobby, but please make sure to get that verified before using it. I might be wrong.
Lastly, let me show you how much pothos actually grows...
A little more than one year ago, long before any frogs actually lived there:
Over a year later, and it's even been through 2 dry periods (breeding attempts), killing some of the leaves. Also,m the dieffenbachia on the left was changed, because... well.
![]()





![Sweden [Sweden]](images/flags/Sweden.gif)




Reply With Quote
![Canada [Canada]](images/flags/Canada.gif)
